Monday, May 27, 2019

The Fall of Gondolin and the Fall of Troy

I think the development of the Lay of the Fall of Gondolin was partly influenced by the tradition of tales about the Fall of Troy.  But the only major article I've found already exploring that is one by Alexander M Bruce written in 2012 focusing mainly on the account of Troy's Fall in Book II of the Aenied with Tuor as Aeneas.

Tolkien certainly may have read that, but given what his overall goals and interests were in developing his Arda mythology, I think the reference to Troy in Snorri Sturluson's Prose Edda is far more likely to be the main account of Troy that Tolkien would have drawn on.

Like in Bruce's Aeneid theory it has Turgon as Priam and Idril Celebrindel as a daughter of Priam.  But Tuor would instead be Múnón or Mennón.  There is some disagreement on who in the earlier accounts of Troy Múnón is based on, he could be the Menon mentioned in Book 12 of the Illiad.  But the more popular fan theory is that he's Memnon.

Memnon lead an army of "Aethiopians" to Troy from the East.  Aethiopia in Greek Mythology didn't quite always mean the kingdom(s) in Africa south of Egypt, Homer said there were Aethiopians at both the far Western and Eastern ends of the Earth.  Being called a "Son of the Dawn" implies Memnon came from the East.  Remember during the time of Tuor from the Elves POV Men had only just recently entered Beleriand from the East.

However the key detail that I think Sturluson's version of Troy has in common with Gondolin that I don't think any other version does is having Twelve Houses.
Near the earth's centre was made that goodliest of homes and haunts that ever have been, which is called Troy, even that which we call Turkland. This abode was much more gloriously made than others, and fashioned with more skill of craftsmanship in manifold wise, both in luxury and in the wealth which was there in abundance. There were twelve kingdoms and one High King, and many sovereignties belonged to each kingdom; in the stronghold were twelve chieftains.
This same description is why I sometimes think Sturluson was just using Troy as a stand in for Jerusalem, but but that may just be me.
Of Gondolin's 12 Houses Tuor became Captain of the White Wing.

Sunday, March 17, 2019

Sword Art Online and Gnosticism

I made this Tweet while Toonami was attempting to air episode 6 of Sword Art Online Alicization on March 16th 2019.
15 minutes ago
The way is using the word makes more sense when your aware that the word translated in the is .
I can't say this is particularly Gnostic, but it reminds me of stuff I'd been wanting to talk about regarding the earlier seasons of Sword Art Online.

The TVTropes page UsefulNotes/Gnosticism claims Gnostic influence on a number of Anime and Video Games that I don't feel hold up.  Especially Evangelion (though I do defend that it's use of religious imagery isn't meaningless) and Final Fantasy VII which is as far the opposite of a Gnostic attitude as you can get.  Revolutionary Girl Utena is the one that holds up, well so does Serial Experiments Lain which I'm not sure was always there.

SAO isn't mentioned there even though I feel it's more applicable to SAO then it is to most they do mention.

First you need to understand that Platonic and Gnostic views of the world are in modern times highly related to the Simulation hypothesis, which frankly is also most of the basis for seeing The Matrix as Gnostic.  When talking about the first episode of season 2 Digibro mocks Kirito's suggestion that the real world might be no different from a Virtual World by saying something like "the real world doesn't disappear if you pull a plug".  However the response to that is pretty easy, what if "God" pulled a plug?  Ironically in his No Game No Life video from 2018 Digi seems to suddenly support a form of Simulation Hypothesis by quoting Elon Musk.

The first arc of SAO is kind of the proper Gnostic Allegory philosophically, since everyone is Sophia in that situation.  But the Alfheim arc while very problematic is the purest allegory of Gnostic mythology with Asuna as Sophia and the villain as a true Demiurge, not a true Creator but merely fiddling around with what Kaiba created.

I'm not gonna go any deeper then that today, I'm hoping to inspire further discussion of the topic from people more qualified then I am to talk about it.

Friday, February 1, 2019

Sauron and Azazel

We all know that Melkor The Morgoth is basically Satan in J.R.R. Tolkien’s mythology.  But have you ever wondered if the other great Dark Lord of Middle Earth can also be equated with a specific Fallen Angel from the Judeo-Christian tradition?  Well I happen to have a theory on that.

Now up front I want to remind people that I’m aware Tolkien hated direct Allegory, like George Lucas he drew on many mythological concepts and motifs, but nothing was meant to be a one to one allegory, even Morgoth’s connection to Satan comes with qualifications (first of which is that it's more of a Paradise Lost perception of Satan then anything The Bible clearly teaches).

Also the development of Sauron as a figure in Tolkien’s Mythology was uniquely complicated.  I personally suspect that before Tolkien actually began writing a sequel to The Hobbit, Sauron’s roles in the tale of Beren and Luthien, in the Fall of Numenor and as the Necromancer mentioned in The Hobbit were three completely separate characters.  For example in the case of Beren and Luthien the role eventually taken by Sauron was originally just a Werecat type monster.  But it’s none of those proto-Saurons I’m comparing to Azazel here, this is specifically about Sauron as The Lord of The Rings.

There are conflicting traditions about Azazel, sometimes that name is just used as another name for Satan, which could very well be the original intent behind it’s use in Leviticus 16.  This analysis is mainly about the figure of Azazel as he appears in The Book of Enoch aka First Enoch.  The Richard Laurence Translation was published in 1883 and the R.H. Charles translation was published in 1917, so both are books Tolkien could have read at some point.

When I first read the Book of Enoch, I couldn’t help but notice how much Azazel’s role stood out narratively.  In the initial list of the leaders of the Grigori/Watchers that fell (chapter 7 verse 9 in the Laurence version and chapter 6 verse 7 in the Charles version) Azazel’s name isn’t included, in either the Ethiopic or Aramaic texts.  Yet when Azazel is first mentioned in chapter 8 verse 1 he is suddenly being treated as one of the single most important of them. 

Then in chapter 10 verses 4-12 he’s given a uniquely different fate, being buried under rocks in Dudael rather then being chained in the Abyss/Tartarus like the others.  I eventually learned some of that uniqueness is a product of how the name is used in Leviticus 16 and traditions derived from that, but it still stands out.  If you think you can explain this by just saying Azazel and Samyaza/Shemjaza are different names for the same Angel, the Aramaic text of chapter 8 lists Shemjaza separately as the one who taught Sorcery.  And Chapter 9 lists them separately in both versions.

In The Enemy section of The Valaquenta in the published Silmarillion, the only Maia who joined Morgoth singled out for special mention are the Balrogs as a group and Sauron as an individual.  One Youtube video I watched on the Balrogs theorized their special status among Morgoth’s followers might be that they were the very first Maia to follow him.  Sauron meanwhile came much later, never openly betraying the Valar till after Angband was firmly established.  So even the difference between Sauron and the Balrogs echos the difference between Azazel and the Grigori. 

But the crux of why I feel this comparison works is what’s said in Chapter 8 Verse 1 of the Book of Enoch.
"And Azâzêl taught men to make swords, and knives, and shields, and breastplates, and made known to them the metals of the earth and the art of working them, and bracelets, and ornaments, and the use of antimony, and the beautifying of the eyelids, and all kinds of costly stones, and all colouring tinctures."
That certainly sounds like he’d be a Maia of Aule (as both Sauron and Saruman were) if placed in Tolkien’s Cosmology.  In fact it’s tempting to see even the Rings of Power themselves in that verse.

I also can’t help but wonder if Dudael where Azazel met his final doom being traditionally placed East of Jerusalem is echoed in Mordor being East of Gondor.

Another possible mythological influence on Sauron were various pagan gods associated with Blacksmithing and/or Volcanoes.  If you were to compare the Valar to the Olympians then Aule would be Hephaestus/Vulcan, yet Sauron ultimately resembles Hephaestus more since Hephaestus was cast down from Olympus. Typhon is a figure in Greek mythology some scholars suspect was originally the same as or an aspect of Hephaestus, one of his birth stories is the same, being borne by Hera in response to the birth of Athena.  Also in some versions Typhon is buried beneath Mt Etna a Volcano on Sicily which is also said to be the location of Hephaestus's workshop.

Is it possible to connect Hephaestus/Typhon to Azazel independent of comparing them to a modern literary figure?  I think so, like for example winding up buried, and of course Azazel’s status as a craftsman already mentioned above.  That the Greeks identified Typhon with Set gives precedence for seeing him as a Desert Storm god.  I feel the Book of Enoch definitely developed post Hellenization, it’s mentioning Tartaros is evidence of that.  There was a blacksmith god in the Canaanite pantheon, Kothar-wa-Khasis, but he wasn’t cast out like Hephaestus was.  So I think the figure of Azazel in the book of Enoch was possibly modeled a bit after Hephaestus and/or Typhon.

So maybe Tolkien likewise consciously or unconsciously made the same connection between them?

Tuesday, January 1, 2019

Greek Myths echoing The Bible

John R Salverda argued for Pelops being based on Ahab.  I had considered that possibly being valid in the past, but by splitting up his parallels for Naboth and Elijah.  But even though in the context of one particular cycle I think certain grandsons of Pelops are memories of some Davidic Kings, I’ve come to view Pelops as mainly a Hellenic memory of Jehu.

Pelops killing Oenomaus in a chariot race could be based on Jehu killing Jehoram son of Ahab in a battle where both rode in Chariots.  Hippodamia could be another example of a Princess in a myth sort of representing the nation.  But given the statement that Jehu did more than what II Kings records it’s not impossible he did marry a princess of the House of Omri, it was the direct male lines of descent from Ahad that were prophesied to be wiped out.

Myrtilus’ curse on the House of Pelops could be a memory of Hosea’s Prophecy that Yahuah will “Avenge the blood of Jezreel upon the House of Jehu” in chapter 1 verse 4.

Stymphalus in this theory represents the Prophets/Priests of Baal at Samaria, who Jehu initially promised peace to but then slaughtered them when he had control of the city in II Kings 10:19-25. 

That equates Samaria with Arcadia. I’ve often identified the Arcadians with the Arkite tribe of Canaan, we don’t have other information on that tribe like we do the first 5 or so Canaanite tribes, they’re mentioned only in Genesis 10 and 1 Chronicles 1.  So Samaria could be where the Arkites originally lived and this Baal cult included some of their genealogical remnant.  [Update: I now know the Arkites referred to people in north western Lebanon north of modern Tripoli.  It could be these particular Priests of Baal Jezebel relied on came from up there.]

It seems possible that the story about Aeacus praying to end a drought after a murder may not have originally been specifically linked to Stymphalus and Pelops, Aeacus’s own Wikipedia page doesn’t mention Stymphalus or Pelops by name here, and he’s generally affiliated with more northern parts of Greece not the Peloponnese.  So my past observation that he maybe resembles Obadiah in 1 Kings 18 who’s piety helped end the drought associated with Elijah remains possible.

Salverda makes a point out of how Aeacus role as a judge of the dead in Plato’s Republic resembles some Jewish traditions about Elijah as a judge of the dead.  But those Jewish tradition are very late, well after men like Philo and Aristobulus of Alexandria had started bringing Platonic ideas into the Judeo-Christian tradition.  So in that case it was the Jews putting Elijah in Aeacus position.

What’s more interesting though is that Aeacus is said to have the keys of Hades.  In Revelation 1 Jesus says He has the Keys of Hades and Death.  In Revelation 3:7 he introduces himself to Philadelphia as he who has the Key of David from Isaiah 22:22.  The equivalent introductions in the other Seven Churches messages all repeat titles from Revelation 1.  Sheol came up in some Davidic Psalms, including one quoted by Peter at Pentecost in Acts 2.  David is also tied to the Resurrection because of how he’s named in Ezekiel 37.  So those keys could be synonymous. 

Pindar Isthmian Odes VIII referred to Aeacus as the dearest of all men to Zeus.  It sounds like Aeacus could be a memory of David more then any Prophet.  Salverda leaves out how royalty did descend from his three sons Peleus, Telamon and Phocus.  Through Achilles son of Peleus the Kings of Epirus claimed descent from Aeacus, and thus through his mother so did Alexander The Great.  What a lot of people don’t know about the Patroclus and Achilles relationship was that Patroclus was actually older than Achilles and a mentor figure to him, not the younger pretty boy you usually see in modern films.  So comparing that relationship to David and Jonathan fits even better than I originally thought.

Aeacus kingdom was also ravaged by a plague once.  He is also said to have built a “Temple” of some type on Mount Panhellenus, but then after he died his people built an even grander Temple.  Pindar also associated him with Psalms.  So Panhellenus could be Zion where the Tabernacle of David was, while the later Temple is a memory of Solomon’s.

Wives and children of Jehoram son of Jehoshaphat King of Judah were taken as hostages by the Philistines.  Joel 3 records how Philistia and Tyre sold Judeans and Jerusalemites as slaves to the Ionians.  Another grandson of Aeacus was said to have founded Salamis on Cyprus (an Island also anciently settled by children of Javan and colonized by Phoenicians) that city could have been named after Salem or David's ancestor Salmon/Salmah/Salma.

Because Greek mythology is very much a composite mythology, Aeacus may not be the only memory of David.  I’ve contemplated Endymion as David before, being both a Shepherd and a King in Elis.  Of the wives of David, Avitail is the first I’d look at as a possible basis for Selene, since her name means ‘Father of the Dew” which is a fitting poetic name for the Moon.  The wives married at Hebron were probably mainly David making important marriage alliances within the Tribe of Judah. 

If one of his wives was of the Jerahmeel clan then it's interesting how that name looks like it begins with the Hebrew word for Moon.  1 Chronicles 2’s genealogy of the Jerahmeel clan includes a Eleasah son of Helez, Eleasah actually makes more sense to me etymologically as an origin for Elis, the Eleans and Elysium then Elishah, though perhaps so could David's son born in Jerusalem named Elishua.

But also Numbers 26:20 tells us there was a clan of Shelanites descended from Judah’s third son Shelah.  The Hebrew word for Shelanite is Shelani (Strong number 8024) which could be an etymological origin for Selene.  1 Chronicles 4:21 also names some sons of Shelah.

Ezekiel 23 gives Aholah as a poetic name for Samaria, probably in the sense of Samaria representing the entire Northern Kingdom,but if you wanted to make it more tribally specific Samaria was properly in Western Manasseh.  Aeolians could have in origin meant people of Aholah but then the Hellenic mythology invented Aeolus to be an ancestral figure for them. 

The original main four sons of Aeolus were Athamas, Salmoneus, Sisyphus and Cretheus.  Some stories about Athamas and his sons clearly seem to be based on Abraham and Isaac.  Meanwhile Salmoneus is clearly a memory of Solomon, while Sisyphus I view as Jeroboam and Cretheus as Abinadab of 1 Kings 4:11 with Taphah as Tyro, the islands of Taphos may also have been named after her.  

Cretheus ruled Thessaly in Greek Mythology, the Dorians were also said to have come from Thessaly according to Herodotus.  In The Bible Dor was a region allotted to Asher but was also inhabited by Manasseites (Joshua 17:11, Judges 1:27 and 1 Chronicles 7:29).  So I think the Aeolians were the Mansseites of Dor while the Dorians were the Asherites.  The name Hellen could come from Hellem who fathered an Asherite clan in 1 Chronicles 7:35.

Of course I should consider that maybe the Dorians who invaded Greece were actually the Canaanites of Dor.  And that the tribe of Asher isn’t lost since all of them seem to have accepted Hezekiah’s Passover Invitation and Anna the Prophetess was of Asher.

Other sons of Aeolus include Makedon and Magnes (who are sometimes given as sons of Aeolus but sometimes as his cousins, sons of a sister of Hellen), and Aethlius the first king of the Eleans. 

This makes the ancestry of Alexander The Great pretty firmly Aeolian though with some Doric and possibly Davidic influence.  Joel 3 foretells that from those Israelites sold into slavery to Greece would come the means by which God would judge Tyre and Philista.  Alexander’s two most notable sieges were of Tyre and Gaza, with Gaza being one of the few cities he completely destroyed.

I already have a post on Jehosheba and Electra which goes on to talk about the Acheans and Danaans being Dan.

On Second thought the Aeolians were probably the Asherites since Thebes was also Aeolian and it was said to be founded by Cadmus coming from Tyre and Tyre was in Asher's allotment and not listed among those Asher couldn't chase the Canaanites out of.  Meanwhile Berea home of the Bereans of Acts 17 was probably originally Aeolian being in northern Thessaly before Macedon captured it.  And I think it's name could come from the Beriites of Numbers 26:44-45 the clan of Asher's son Beriah of Genesis 46:17, I also suspect Larissa could be a reference to Ishuah.